Sessions Brawl Snowboard Pants Ink Blue Denim

Customer Reviews | Add Your Review!

• "Sick looking pants"

  L. P., MELBOURNE, Vic
  Pros: Colour, quality, Price Cons: none,

  been waiting for these to go on sale, sweet looking and great price

• "tidy pants"

  L. C., Sydney, NSW
  Pros: snug, Cons: very light,

  pretty good spring pants, slim fit makes it hard to layer

• "Quite Slim"

  R. J., Mansfield, Vic
  Pros: Colours, Fit , Cons: Bit thin, Stain easily ,

  These pants fit exactly how i expected them to, i got a size bigger because I didnt want them super slim. So if you want slim pants but not super slim these are good just get a size larger. They are also a bit thin but fine if you wear a thermal underneath. All up, great design, great colours and a great price!

• "Slim fit!"

  M. B., Melbourne, Vic
  Pros: Draw string, eleminating the need for a belt, Perfect Length, Super soft and comfortable Cons: No zip gators, only buttons,

  These pants are exactly as described. Slim fitting, super comfortable! and just the right length. They're not the warmest pants, but they do protect you from the snow. The only downside would be the fact that the pants don't have zip gators, only buttons but that's no real big issue. Overall, a great pant

• "Cool pants!!"

  J. M., Essendon, Vic
  Pros: Bright, Fits well, Cons: Every thin, Not alot of pockets ,

  Cool bright pants, very thin, and the orange pants and bright pink linning! These pants are not for warmth, but great for protection from the snow!

• "Tighter than expected"

  A. L., Aberdeen, oth
  Pros: Looks awesome, Cons: Slim fit,

  I wear a 34 inch trouser and this is quite tight for me. It actually fits more like a pair of jeans than snowboard trousers. They look really good though.

• "Slim Fit!"

  M. A., FREMONT, CA
  Pros: Definitely gives the impression of wearing jeans, Cons:

  Definitely liked how theses looked and felt like jeans. Use this a couple times and even with the slim fit it still allowed for good movement. If you want a looser fit, get a size bigger

• "Quite good"

  NA,
  Pros: Slim fit, 10,000 waterproof 8,000 Breathable, Cons: Bit thin, Warmth rating of 2, Lack of pockets

  Bought these pants at $75, and they are now down to $45. They are a steal at that price. 10,000 waterproof and 8,000 breathability for $45, cant complain really. They are a slim fit which looks good. I bought a large and i'm 6 foot and they are a good fit. Some pants can look really baggy, but these look quite good. I'm pretty happy with these. Cons are they are a bit thin, so they are not going to keep you too warm, but they are more meant for maximum breathability. So if you usually get hot wearing snowboard pants, these pants will work well. I'm not too fussed about the warmth too much as I will be wearing thermals underneath. Because the pants are a slim fit, they aren't too many pockets, but this ain't such a bad thing. There are 4 pockets, two at the waist and two on the bum. Personally i prefer using my pockets in my jacket anyway. Definitely recommend if you are looking for a good quality, thin pair of pants that are still very waterproof. P.S. Inner pant is pink! Doesn't really matter as you can't see it, but may put some people off.

• "decent pants nothing special"

  V. S., PORTLAND, ME
  Pros: slim fit if you like that , Cons: slim fit if you dont like that, color tang was too bright like convict jump suit, not enough pockets

  i tried them on and didnt like the fit at all. I wasnt to impressed with the features either. Not enough pockets. I got a large and it fit like a small. Its hard to find slim fit pants so if thats what you like this are for you. I am sending mine back and keeping my session achilles (check out the review on it). size jeans i wear are 34/30 for normal fit these large fit like 32/32 slimming at the knees

• "Brawlers!"

  M. L., Lakewood, IL
  Pros: Very warm, Awesome color, Good durability Cons: Not as slim as described,

  I bought a pair of these in the 2006 model from ebay and I've got to admit, they are one great pair of boarding pants. My only qualm is that unless you go down a size, they might be baggier than you were expecting. So I probably should have gotten the L rather than XL. But whats done is done and I'm satisfied with what I've got. Here's hoping that the 2010 model actually do come in the slim fit as described.