Item # k21kwibcbk14zz-k2-splitboard-bindings

K2 Kwicker BC Splitboard Bindings 2016

Our Price
$199.95
Black

In Stock

Ships Within 24 Hours
Sellout Risk: Very High

*Available for US Shipment Only.
Qty:

Description: K2 Kwicker BC Splitboard Bindings

Based on the solid function of the past, the Kwicker binding is setting the path for the future of splitboarding. With its incredibly fast and easy gloves-on Pinless transition function and cored aluminum chassis, the Kwicker binding is a key part of the systems lightest and fastest claims. Simple mechanisms and less moving parts than a traditional setup adds to the durability and trust in taking it deep into the backcountry.

Key Features of the K2 Kwicker BC Splitboard Bindings:
  • Chassis: 6061-T6 Aluminum
  • Pinless transition
  • 3° Canted baseplate

Kwicker BC


There are no reviews for this item. Write a Review
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0
0
0
0
0

Browse 3 questions and 3 answers
Hide answersShow all answers | Sort by
Why did you choose this?
The-House.com Store
Kwicker
Blake B on Nov 6, 2014
Are these bindings compatible with the Shimano Skylord boots, that work on the original K2 Clicker step-in bindings?...I have the K2 Plasma clickers.
Scott N on Aug 26, 2015
Best Answer: Hi Scott,

These K2 Kwicker BC Splitboard Bindings are only compatible with the NEW K2 Kwicker Snowboard Boots like the K2 COmpass that you can view HERE: http://www.the-house.com/k22cmp09bn15zz-k2-snowboard-boots.html
Reply · Report · Matt GStaff on Aug 27, 2015
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
The 2014 model Kwickers were recalled, is this a 2015 model. It should have a '0' stamped on the back of the heel plate to indicate it is the new model. I need to know that it is the 2015 model with the zero stamped on it?
Mike H on Oct 22, 2014
Best Answer: Mike - I have been informed by our buying department that these are the new bindings. All previous models were returned to K2...so you're good to go.
Reply · Report · Roy MStaff on Oct 22, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)

To Top