Item # bt4wcf01bwhj10zz-burton-snowboard-pants

Burton TWC Flared Snowboard Pants - Womens

Our Price
$95.95 - $104.95
Sugg. Retail: $174.95
40% OFF
You Save $70.00 Instantly

In Stock

Ships Within 24 Hours
Sellout Risk: Extremely High

*Available for US Shipment Only.
Qty:

Specs

Material: DRYRIDE Durashell 2-Layer Coated Raised Twill
Insulation:
  • Non Insulated
Fabric Waterproof:
  • 10,000mm
Fabric Breathability:
  • 10,000g
Fit:
  • Tight
  • TWC Slim Fit
Venting:
  • Yes
  • Mesh-Lined Inner Thigh Vents
Seams Taped: Fully
Pockets: Handwarmer pockets
Jacket - Pants Connections: Yes
Gaiters: Yes
Recco Reflector: No
Recommended Use:
  • Skiing
  • Snowboarding
Manufacturer Warranty: 1 Year

Description: Burton TWC Flared Snowboard Pants - Womens

If you're tired of the same old boring unreliable pants time after time, then you need the Burton TWC Flared Snowboard Pants. Featuring 10,000mm waterproof rating, you can practically take a bath in these things and stay completely dry, although it is highly recommended that you don't do that. The pants 10,000g breathability rating also allow for maximum comfort whether you're out for a jog or just relaxing in your backyard. Discover what a pair of reliable pants can do for you with the TWC Flared Snowboard Pants.

Key Features of the Burton Twc Flared Snowboard Pants:
  • 10,000mm Waterproof
  • 10,000g Breathability
  • DRYRIDE Durashell 2-Layer Coated Raised Twill [10,000MM, 10,000G]
  • TWC Slim Fit
  • TWC Closed Cell Mesh and Taffeta Lining
  • Mesh-Lined Inner Thigh Vents
  • Fully Taped Seams
  • Custom Hemable Cuffs
  • Includes WMS White Collection P

Discontinued Colors

Twc Flared


Customer Reviews | Add Your Review!

  • "Good looking pants"

    , AL
    Pros: Slimming, Longer side, nice if you are tall, Waterproof Cons: Could be tight for layering/protection, No waist band,

    Tried several Burton pants and this one is so far best fit/looking yet comfortable. I got two pairs (mulberry, plaid), maybe get one more. Think this is like bootcut jeans. It's tighter around thighs (but not too tight), so if you want to wear protections/layers and wonder between two sizes, you may want to order a bigger size. I usually am size 4/S for regular clothes, and size 5 for this works fine.

  • "Good looking pants"

    , AL
    Pros: Slimming, Longer side, nice if you are tall, Waterproof Cons: Could be tight for layering/protection, No waist band,

    Tried several Burton pants and this one is so far best fit/looking yet comfortable. I got two pairs (mulberry, plaid), maybe get one more. Think this is like a bootcut jeans. It's tighter around thighs (but not too tight), so if you want to wear protections/layers and wonder between two sizes, you may want to order a bigger size. I usually size 4/S for regular clothes, and size 5 for this works fine.

  • "Nice snow pants !!"

    , West Jordan, UT
    Pros: Long enough to go over boots, Gives just enough room to layer underneath, Stylish button slits Cons: Have to use a belt to keep pants up, Wished it had velcro or snap ons around the waist ,

    I'm 5'3 and the length of the pants are just perfect for me. I like them long enough to cover my boots. I bought 2 - one in black and one in brown in size 3. Pants fit perfect everywhere except around the waist. I have to use a belt even with one layer underneath maybe I should've got a size 1. I wanted just enough room for layering. I like the the slim fit style way better than the cargo loose so in my opinion these pants ROCK!


Browse 1 question and 7 answers
Hide answersShow all answers | Sort by
Why did you choose this?
The-House.com Store
This was a birthday present for my daughter, who just now opened it! Runs very large, had to exchange for smaller size!
Lisa B on Mar 23, 2014
i have a pair of these in black. I am 5'10" and always have a difficult time finding pants that are long enough and fit right, but these are awesome! I am getting these as a second pair.
Martina N on Dec 22, 2013
Polka dot pant will look great with new black coat
jami r on Dec 26, 2013
Style
David C on Dec 17, 2013