Item # 9856btripcw14zz-burton-snowboards

Burton Ripcord Wide Snowboard

Sold Out

Sorry this item is currently sold out.

Please use this discount coupon for an
additional 5% off during checkout:

H30404

VIEW LIKE PRODUCTS »

Specs

Type: All Mountain
Shape: Directional, 3-5MM Taper Depending on Size
Camber: Rocker
Flex: Soft/Medium
Width: Wide
Mounting Pattern: 3D
Sidewall Type: Sidewall
Core: Fly
Base: Extruded
Sidecut: Radial
Stance Setback: 1.0 cm
Recommended Use: Entry Level
Manufacturer Warranty: 1 Year

Description: Burton Ripcord Wide Snowboard

For the beginner snowboarder, there's nothing better than the trusty Burton Ripcord Wide Snowboard to accompany you on your first descents down the side of the mountain. The directional base features a flex rating of 3, giving more pop at the back, allowing the user to have an easier time initiating turns, and softening landings in powder. The Ripcord Wide Snowboard is laminated in Biax Fiberglass, offering increased durability and more flexibility to make this an excellent board for the amateur snowboarder. With the Burton Ripcord Snowboard in hand, even the toughest slopes will be nothing more than powder under your feet in no time at all!

Key Features of the Burton Ripcord Wide Snowboard:
  • BEND: V-Rocker
  • ITEM No. 10704100
  • SHAPE: Directional [3-5MM Taper Depending on Size]
  • FLEX: Directional
  • CORE: Fly
  • FIBERGLASS: Biax
  • BASE: Extruded
Dimensions
Length (cm) 156 158 162
Effective Edge (cm) 121.5 123 127.5
Tip Width (cm) 30.45 30.63 30.98
Tail Width (cm) 29.95 30.13 30.48
Waist Width (cm) 25.8 25.9 26.1
Sidecut (m) 7.79 7.91 8.18

Burton ICS channel boards will only work with Burton EST, Burton 3-hole or other ICS compatible bindings.
Burton 3-hole boards will only work with non-EST Burton bindings or other 3-hole compatible bindings.

Ripcord Wide


There are no reviews for this item. Write a Review
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0
0
0
0
0

Browse 9 questions and 17 answers
Hide answersShow all answers | Sort by
Why did you choose this?
The-House.com Store
Couldn't stand the sad look on my son's face anymore!
Patti K on Dec 2, 2014
because it was at a good price and still looks good and had the right size
Elmer H on Jan 12, 2014
style and specs I am looking for
Sean T on Jan 12, 2014
So, I'm 6'2", 250 with a size 13 boot and in the market for a new board and bindings. Would I be able to go with this board in a 162 wide or should i find something bigger? My last board was a 160 regular and the only problem i found with it was the width so...
Ben S on Nov 14, 2014
Best Answer: Ben,
The 162 version of this Ripcord would work for you. The Waist Width is 26.1 which is for sure wider that your previous board. Most of your length decision is personal preference, and if you liked the 160ish range, stick with it. For the record, Burton suggests the 162 would be the best version of this board for you.
Reply · Report · Tim CStaff on Nov 19, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (1)
hi i have a size 11.5, im 5 10 and i weigh 145 lbs. First of all i am wondering if the 158 w would be good for me and also what would be a cheaper pair of bindings that would fit with this board as i am on a budget?
Thanks
max s on Dec 7, 2014
Best Answer: Max, defiantly get the wide. My son is 5'9 200 lbs and his shoe is a ten. looking at it you cant tell its a wide, its not much different and it will be easier to carve. I got the basic black burton bindings LARGE that were the cheapest and the house boots also the cheapest. the boots tie on the inside and out. Laces are the best and they don't break. wasn't pumped about the looks being white and all but when it got here it looks awesome. red white and blue, America's colors and the colors pop. I researched like crazy and board myself, can always count on burton quality even if its there cheaper line. Also the rocker seems to be the best for beginners, mad important. its for x-mas so I cant ride it yet. wish I could. good luck
Reply · Report · Eric L on Dec 8, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
I'm 6'2" 178lbs with a size 12 shoe, do I need to get the wide version?
A shopper on Nov 12, 2014
Best Answer: I would say yes. I'm 6'1" and wear size 11 boots, Burton website recommended a wide version ripcord.
Reply · Report · Erik A on Nov 13, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
what kind of bindings do you recomend for this board?
A shopper on Jul 11, 2014
Best Answer: The Burton Custom Snowboard Bindings would be a great match up for the Burton Ripcord Snowboard. Check out the Custom Bindings HERE: http://www.the-house.com/bt1cu02bk13zz-burton-snowboard-bindings.html
Reply · Report · Matt GStaff on Jul 14, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
Im 5'5, Would it be good to get a board that is 156"cm ?
Oscar B on Nov 28, 2013
Best Answer: Hi Oscar,

I'm not at all a professional when it comes to snowboard sizing, but I think it's a bit more important to use your weight than your height. Also, depending on your experience level, a shorter board may be more appropriate than a longer one if you're still a beginner.

Check out this article on The-House's website for details:
http://www.the-house.com/helpdesk/snowboard-sizing/
Reply · Report · Anna R on Nov 28, 2013
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
I'm 5'11" 175 lbs with a size 10.5 shoe. will the wide version fit me?
Justin C on Nov 23, 2014
Best Answer: You fit within all the weight ranges of each size but fit best in the 158cm Burton Ripcord.
Reply · Report · Matt GStaff on Nov 28, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
I'm 170 lbs and 6'...158 or 162?
Cole J on Nov 21, 2014
Best Answer: Cole,
Most of your answer is personal preference and style of boarding you will do most. I would suggest looking at the 162.
Reply (1) · Report · Tim CStaff on Nov 21, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)
Would a 156 (W) Burton Ripcord be the right size for someone who is 165lb's?
Tyler on Jan 21, 2014
Best Answer: Tyler- You could go shorter but a 156cm would work. However don't go wide unless you have a 11+ foot.
Reply · Report · Roy MStaff on Nov 3, 2014
· Add Answer · I Have This Question Too (0)

To Top